Showing posts with label Listy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Listy. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Day 5: The Task of a Solution

3:4-5:2

Mary Baker Eddy says the rule is established and our task is to work out the solution. Here is some of the work I need to do:

  1. Reflect God
  2. Express gratitude in action
  3. Be sincere
  4. Prayer: patience, meekness, love, good deeds
  5. Habits of unceasing good
  6. Watchfulness
  7. Obedience

 

2010

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Day 251:

503:6-505:3

The thought came to me today that while reading this chapter, I need to remember the first tenet, the inspired word. It is all to easy to get very literal and what-if the text when that isn’t what I’m reading it for.

Mary Baker Eddy writes the same thing several different ways in this reading but I underlined them all:

No supposition of error enters there.

God creates neither [1] erring thought, [2] mortal life, [3] mutable truth, nor [4] variable love.

Immortal Mind makes its own record, but [1] mortal mind, [2] sleep, [3] dreams, [4] sin, [5] disease, and [5] death have no record in the first chapter of Genesis.

This is a great support for the beginning/only idea of yesterday.

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Day 237: More than one Mind

469:7-471:21

In the definition of Mind, there are several nuggets of thought to work on. The main point is that there is only one, divine Mind:

The supposed existence of more than one mind was the basic error idolatry. This error assumed [1] the loss of spiritual power, [2] the loss of the spiritual presence of Life, as infinite Truth without an unlikeness, and [3] the loss of Love as ever present and universal.

I think the last point, the loss of Love, is the most immediate issue for me. How about you?

Friday, August 20, 2010

Day 227: The First Impression

449:7-451:7

This reading still deals with sin. MBE informs us that our porter at the door of thought is our sign post of Character:

The first impression, made on a mind which is attracted or repelled according to personal merit or demerit, is a good detective of individual character.

Her instruction is pointed:

Christian Scientists must live under the constant pressure of the apostolic command to come out from the material world and be separate. They must renounce [1] aggression, [2] oppression, and [3] the pride of power.

Her first statement sums up why:

The wrong done another reacts most heavily against one’s self.

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Day 185: Off course

364:32-366:29

I seem to be either totally on topic with Mary Baker Eddy in the readings (granted, this is rare) or on my own train of thought, working through my own issues. Today is the later for me. I’ve been contemplating harmony lately as my life seems to not have much of it at this point. I assume this is a momentary period that will end but it seems to be going on for a while. Here is what I marked in the readings:

“Take no thought for your life.”

And:

The poor suffering heart needs its rightful nutriment, such as peace, patience in tribulation, and a priceless sense of the dear Father’s loving-kindess.

In the first quote, instead of thinking about life as an infinite state of being, I was just thinking about my day-to-day thoughts, actions, feelings. And that I shouldn’t take thought of those at all. Sort of a code phrase for “Don’t worry.”

The second quote was a list of things I needed and didn’t know it until I read the sentence.

Monday, May 17, 2010

Day 127: What is the model before mortal mind?

247:10-249:11

I'm getting some wonkiness from the above link. It is technically correct but the spirituality website doesn't seem to like it all the time - fair warning.

Today's reading is a continuation of yesterday's but instead of dealing with time in terms of decay and death, these pages focus on the Spirituality of immortal man - the intangible qualities of man we strive for: grace, goodness, etc.

When I was a child and into my teenage and college years, these pages seemed as though they we re talking to someone other than me. Grace? Comeliness? These weren't qualities I was interested in obtaining nor did I see their value:

Comeliness and grace are independent of matter.
I have matured and found I gravitate to people with these qualities. I would add happy (or calm or a balanced life) and the center of harmony in that person's circle of friends:
the unchanging calm and glorious freedom of spiritual harmony
The last thing I underlined:

We must form perfect models in thought and look at them continually, or we shall never carve them out in grand and noble lives. Let [1] unselfishness, [2] goodness, [3] mercy, [4] justice, [5] health, [6] holiness, [7] love -- the kingdom of heaven -- reign within us...
Whenever I read the above section, I stopped at grand and noble.That was for fairytales and movies and heros. But now I have a different idea about who can be grand and noble and someday I might get there. The list of attributes helps me recognize what I need to work on -- uh, most of them. But I'm working on the model in my thought continually.and standing porter at the door of thought. Reading S&H every day helps with that. 

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Day 105: Spiritual Perception

203:7-205:6

Yesterday I struggled with belief versus practice. I don't think my issues with this are done but I am actively reading for ideas on how to gain spiritual ground. The first section I marked was clear in its purpose:

Spiritual perception [1] brings out the possibilities of being, [2] destroys reliance on aught but God, and so [3] makes man the image of his Maker in deed and in truth.
The last paragraph of the section discusses the idea of God in matter as pantheistic then goes on to list what will happen as long as these mistaken belief continues. The items in the list that caught my attention was sinning without knowing it. In some ways I do this but in a lot of ways, I know and I just don't stop. Why?

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Day 104: Our beliefs

201-203:6

I've read these two pages so many times in the last few days that I feel like I'm probably reading them too much. When I think of the chapters that come to mind easily and that I remember enjoying, this isn't one of them. Some how the middle of the book eludes me. So you may be surprised when I say that the only think that stood out to me in these two pages is:

Our beliefs about a Supreme Being contradict the practice growing out of them.
There are lots of good ideas in these two pages but they seem normal, run of the mill, if there is such a C.S. thing as that. But this statement seems packed with issues -- at least for me.

The next sentence I underlined, I also did the listy:

In the Science of Christianity, Mind -- omnipotence -- [1] has all-power, [2] assigns sure rewards to righteousness, and [3] shows that matter can neither heal nor make sick, create nor destroy.

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Day 86: Physiology

165-166:32

Today is the first two pages of chapter 7, Physiology. Mary Baker Eddy starts discussing Mind, mortal mind, body, and physicians so in some regard this feels like a continuation of the last chapter -- or at least a good transition to this one. This is a chapter I usually read when I'm working on a physical challenge although

The thing I noted

Mind is all that [1] feels, [2] acts, or [3] impedes action.
 It's the last point that caught my attention -- impedes action. Why would God impede action? What action would God impede?

Maybe I'm reading to closely and literally. I think I'll edit the sentence: Mind is all. I'll work with that for today.

Friday, March 19, 2010

Day 78: Back to "Peace, Be Still"

148:7 - 150:3

I've been working over the material in my mind of the last 78 days. "Peace, Be Still" is fresh in my mind. I'm leaning on it a lot when I'm irritated. I'm also going back to "Patience, Meekness, Love, and Good Deeds."

Today's two items that are marked are:

Whatever guides thought spiritually benefits mind and body. 
Right now, this journal is guiding my thought. But I want to quiet my thought so I can hear the Truth. So peace, be still.
We need to [1] understand the affirmations of divine Science, [2] dismiss superstition, and [3] demonstrate truth according to Christ.
Understanding the affirmations isn't as easy as understanding the negations, at least to me. So I totally see why Mary Baker Eddy made the first point here. Superstition comes in a wide variety. Some are obvious but most are not. I have to be diligent about what I let into my thought and whether I immediately know the truth about it.

On a side note here, I love this line because it almost sounds contemporary:

The logic is lame, and facts contradict it.

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Day 73: One sentence, two lists

138:17-140:3

These two pages Christianity versus contemporary religious thought in Mary Baker Eddy's day. She focuses on what Jesus' theology was.

There are three sentences that I turned into lists, but I want to focus on just one of them. For most of my life here is how I read this sentence:

Our Master said to every follower: "[1] Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature!...[2]Heal the sick!...[3] Love thy neighbor as thyself!"
When I read the first point, I focused on preach and totally ignored the first part. Then I took class instruction and here is how I heard someone else read the sentence:

Our Master said to every follower: "[1] Go ye into all the world, and [2] preach the gospel to every creature!...[3]Heal the sick!...[4] Love thy neighbor as thyself!"
The idea of the new first point is that you can't hide your head in the sand and still obey the command. It also means that to be a Christian isn't to be alone or solitary but to have relationships with people that include the other points.  I've been working on being in the world this last year but I would rather be alone - so at this point, the letter but not the spirit. Another thing to work on.

Unrelated - sort of
Two ideas that have come to me to work on are time and irritation.

Time: I am dominated by my belief in time in so many ways. As an example, I usually have at least two time pieces on my body at all times: watch and phone. And a third within visual range. Does that make any sense? No. I've been thinking about ideas to overcome this from a spiritual perspective.

Irritation: So, within the last two years, I've come to have the symptoms of spring-time allergies but the funny thing is I don't believe in allergies. So what's up with that? Well, I have been irritated a lot in the last few years and yes, the worst of it is in the spring. It's been a slow realization about how irritated I am emotionally with some of the people, events, and circumstances in my life. While sitting in church today, I started mapping out a C.S. treatment for myself. My teacher told me to do one a day so I would be in the habit but did I listen? Oh, no. So here I am, absolutely tired of blowing my nose, and wanting to not be irritated with myself and the people in my life. The words that came to me were patience, trust, perfection, harmony, balance. 

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Day 66: Man's harmony

124:3-126:7

The first sentence I focused on is:

[1]Adhesion, [2] cohesion, and [3] attraction are properties of Mind.

I've linked up the dictionary for each of these three words. They are very nearly the same. I don't know why Mary Baker Eddy decided to list all three but I like to think she was throwing the largest circle of meaning possible by using all three instead of one. We reflect these properties so we adhere, cohere and attract each other.Something like that. Its a different way to discuss harmony with our body and harmony with others. 

The next sentence:

Neither organic inaction nor overaction is beyond God's control;
I always look up organic just to remember it meant our organs so long ago, not a farming style. So this sentence is also about harmony.

And the last sentence:

Reflecting God's government, man is self-governed.
This self-government was probably at this point of the page meant to be a physical self-government but I think it applies well to any part of man.

When I read these two pages, I underlined, then kept reading and I didn't get an overall theme for the pages - sometimes I do, but not today. I went back and studied these sentences for meaning and relationship. And then I saw the connection of harmony. I'm so glad someone thought up this journal idea of two pages a day. It helps me focus and not read too quickly or forget what I read.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Day 59: Principle and Practice

109:32-112:2

These pages continue Mary Baker Eddy's discussion of how she came to discover Christian Science. The two passages I marked are:

The three great verities of Spirit, [1] omnipotence, [2] omnipresence, [3] omniscience, - Spirit possessing all power, filling all space, constituting all Science, - contradict forever the belief that matter can be actual.
And -

The Principle of divine metaphysics is God; the practice of divine metaphysics is the utilization of the power of Truth over error; its rules demonstrate its Science.

MBE also states reason and revelation were reconciled for her as part of her journey. That sounds very close to a line I marked on Day 50. The idea of these two ideas tied together and then repeated within 20 pages of each other means something. I never picked up on this connection before.

MBE states she used only the Bible as her textbook. I've never read the Bible all the way through - any version.

As the material in the chapters gets to this stage where new concepts are introduced -- or I didn't pay attention one of the many times I read the material before -- I have to slow down and think about what is pinging around in my head. Jumbled thoughts point somewhere but not at first. So I may ramble more than usual.

Words I looked up:
equipollence
theosophy
millenarianism

Friday, February 26, 2010

Day 57

105:22-106:29

Today is the last day of this chapter. The last two pages end on a bang. Mary Baker Eddy has gone from hypnotism at the beginning of the chapter to people using their mental powers to an evil end. I'm sure there's a general word for this but it escapes me right now. I see the anti-hero trying to persuade the person to climb on the train tracks while the train is about to run them over. What is the name of that bad guy? I don't mean the CS term but the average word you would use to describe this person. Drives me nuts when I can't remember a word.

Back to the point.

So the last two pages, Mary Baker Eddy  says:

to go from the use of inanimate drugs to the criminal misuse of human willpower, is [1] to drop from the platform of common manhood into the very mire of iniquity, [2] to work against the free course of honesty and justice, and [3] to push vainly against the current running heavenward

 I don't think anyone reading this book would try to achieve mental powers with the intent of harm. I'm a glass half-full type, meaning I'm optimistic people just want to be good. That said, there is a reason MBE came up with a Rule for Motives and Acts stated in the Church Manual. It is a slippery slope and once you get on it, it can go downhill quickly.

Meaning...

We all just want what's best and we, each of us individually, think we know what that is. And we guide people to that point, thinking we are doing the right thing. The 'we' I refer to isn't listening to the still small voice in this example or angel thoughts, or reflecting God. But that's hard to see or hear when our own self-will gets in the way. At least, that's the way it is for me.

MBE ends the chapter with two lists, one as the works of the flesh and one as the fruits of the Spirit. These are dramatic, big, in-your-face lists so it is easy to say I want to good list, obviously. But it if the subtler forms of the works of the flesh list which is the tricky part. Wrath and strife are the two that have shades of grey I need to keep an eye out for.

How about you? Anything on the works of the flesh list that has some grey for you?

I want to give this chapter a nickname but Mental Malpractice seems too CS-ish. Any ideas?

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Day 56

104:3-105:21

These two pages covers two different topics, one leading to the other. The first topic is animal magnetism as belief. The second topic is something along the lines of to think a crime is the same as to do the crime -- mental crime.

I'm still brewing about these two pages. Here is what I underlined:

The medicine of Science is divine Mind; and [1] dishonesty, [2] sensuality, [3] falsehood, [4] revenge, [5] malice, are animal propensities and by no means the mental qualities which heal the sick.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Day 53

97:29-99:29

Today is the last day of this chapter. When I started the chapter, I wasn't looking forward to it and couldn't believe how long it was. Now, I'm thrilled - I totally get this chapter but think it could use a new name: One God.

I marked several things. I'll see if I can explain why.

It is imperious throughout all ages as Christ's revelation of Truth, of Life, and of Love, which remains inviolate for every man to understand and to practise.

These three (Truth, Life, Love) are everywhere in the book so when they are together, I tend to slow down on the sentence. Here, Mary Baker Eddy is saying I must understand and practice them. I've mentioned before how I tend to focus on these three and delve for a deeper understanding so I think I'm working on that one. But practicing? Well, that could use some work on my part. Don't mean to be cheeky about it, but, yeah, I have some work to do there.

The next thing I underlined was a listy thing:

The way through which immortality and life are learned is [1] not ecclesiastical but Christian, [2] not human but divine, [3] not physical but metaphysical, [4] not material but scientifically spiritual. 
Then:

Christian Science is unerring and Divine, the human sense of things errs because it is human.

I'm still stuck back on Day 50's Divine Logic, so now when I see Divine, it stands out to me.

I liked MBE's summation of the chapter:

The calm, strong currents of true spirituality, the manifestations of which are health, purity, and self-immolation, must deepen human experience, until the beliefs of material existence are seen to be a bald imposition, and sin, disease, and death give everlasting place to the scientific demonstration of divine Spirit and to God's spiritual, perfect man.

Deepening my experience -- that is a good summation of this chapter. 

On a side note, I'm going to tag the previous posts so I can find things easier. Not sure how that will affect RSS readers. And today is post 50. Any thoughts or suggestions? If you don't want to comment on the blog but would rather make more pointed comments privately, feel free to email me (dina.readinginoneyear@gmail.com).