The testimony today is a story about someone suffering, finding the book, then being healed. Whenever I give a testimony, you can be sure it isn’t as eloquent or well-crafted. Standing up at church, everyone turning to look while I speak, is scary. These testimonies are amazing for the literary quality as well as the detail, spiritual resolution, and healing. Without the craft of the story, the importance of it would diminish. I wonder if people were just better storytellers back then. Anyway, I’ve very grateful for the quality and the meaning of the testimonies.
Monday, November 22, 2010
Monday, November 15, 2010
Day 312: A Healing Story
This has to be the best testimony yet. It is so passionately and clearly stated.
Two of the thoughts in this testimony has that rang true were:
The healing was brought about by the earnest, conscientious seeking for the truth, as contained in the Bible and interpreted by our Leaded in our textbook, Science and Health.
And:
I have also learned that in living and loving is healing realized, and in reflecting divine Love I have the “signs following.”
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Day 283: Questions for the Audience
The book of Revelation is almost completely unfamiliar to me. In reading this chapter, The Apocalypse, I don’t know what is going to happen next in the biblical text. This is the first chapter where I have had to read and re-read to figure out what is going on biblically and from Mary Baker Eddy’s explanation.
The point she makes that I was most unaware of, so far, is that Genesis and Revelation both start with true stories and then proceed with false stories. So just for clarification, where does the true Revelation story start and end? If you know, please comment below.
She comes back to two points that are interesting but have been a while since she mentioned:
- Self-abnegation is a rule in Christian Science
- He that [1] touches the hem of Christ’s robe and [2] masters his mortal beliefs, animality, and hate, rejoices in the proof of healing
What does she mean by touches the hem of Christ’s robe? Is the figurative interpretation that someone reaches out for Christ?
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Day 271: The Purpose of 2 Stories
I didn’t think much about Christian Science Treatments or know the details until I took class instruction. That isn’t to say the information was secret; I just wasn’t interested in pursuing it. But now that I’m a few days back from annual association of class instruction, and it ended with example treatments, they are on my mind.
These two stories are so clearly different in every possible way. I’m sure there is a scholarly reason for including both, just as the four gospels recount the same stories of Jesus (sort of). But from a figurative perspective, a spiritual perspective, they appear to be parts of an original treatment.
There are two quotes in this reading that hit home for me.
…a material creation which followed the spiritual, – a creation so wholly apart from God’s, that Spirit had no participation in it.
And,
man exists because God exists
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Day 266: Enmity between Man & Woman
When I read Genesis 3:15 in this section, I couldn’t believe it. I don’t read the second story much accept as it is used in the weekly bible lesson, so I didn’t remember the actual wording. Wow. Those are some powerful and hateful words to attribute to God. No wonder a God of Love isn’t universally accepted.
To me, this just clarifies that it is an erroneous story and the two stories combine to be the first treatment of man.
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Day 264: Right & Wrong
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Day 260: The 2nd Story in Genesis
There are 2 stories and they are very different. The first is abstract, vague, and wonderful. The second is specific, concrete, and error. Oddly, the second story is considered the story. I bet it’s the specificity and concreteness that people like, but the story is not happy in the end and people, loads of people, still subject women as an entire gender to crap based on what is written in that second story.
So I’m a first story person, obviously.
But I had a thought. Most of us create something in our lives and we want that creation (children, house, business, etc) to endure beyond us. We aren’t building temporary creations. But the second story is. The earth gets to stick around forever in the story but the people are disposable. I can’t imagine any being of love creating that.
Monday, July 12, 2010
Day 184: Mary Magdalene and the Pharisee
Today is the first chapter in Christian Science Practice. Mary Baker Eddy retells the story of Mary Magdalene and the story within that story of the debtors. Toward the end of the reading, MBE makes the point do we study Christian Science as the Pharisee who loved little or as Mary Magdalene did with a meekness.
I hate to say this but I feel as though I am somewhere in the middle, not where I want to be and not where I was.
How does anyone gain a deeper spiritual insight while still being of this world? And while being of this world, how do you not be in it?
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Monday, May 17, 2010
Day 126: What time is it?
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Day 125: Age and Decay
The story in this reading is of the woman who never aged, waiting for her lover from youth to return. It is a beautiful story. I love Mary Baker Eddy's stories. She tells them well.
I didn't mark any passages because I have been thinking about age lately. I have small children and I have friends who are just past retirement. Most of the people I see are between the ages of thirty and fifty. So on a daily basis, I deal with three generations of people.
Society places a large importance on behavior, thinking, and speech based on age. Little kids can do all sorts of things adults can't do. Seniors, the same. So it is terrible hard for me to get away from the concept of age on any given day. Before kids, it seems like it was much easier to just be oblivious.
So I'm working on age. I want to respect the wisdom that comes with experience but ignore the material aspect of the effects of time passing. That's tricky.
What caught your eye?